Skip to main content

Error handling

Error handling
6.2.5 This page will describe collisions and how they are handled on a network.


The most common error condition on Ethernet networks are collisions. Collisions are the mechanism for resolving contention for network access. A few collisions provide a smooth, simple, low overhead way for network nodes to arbitrate contention for the network resource. When network contention becomes too great, collisions can become a significant impediment to useful network operation.

Collisions result in network bandwidth loss that is equal to the initial transmission and the collision jam signal. This is consumption delay and affects all network nodes possibly causing significant reduction in network throughput.

The considerable majority of collisions occur very early in the frame, often before the SFD. Collisions occurring before the SFD are usually not reported to the higher layers, as if the collision did not occur. As soon as a collision is detected, the sending stations transmit a 32-bit “jam” signal that will enforce the collision. This is done so that any data being transmitted is thoroughly corrupted and all stations have a chance to detect the collision.

In Figure two stations listen to ensure that the cable is idle, then transmit. Station 1 was able to transmit a significant percentage of the frame before the signal even reached the last cable segment. Station 2 had not received the first bit of the transmission prior to beginning its own transmission and was only able to send several bits before the NIC sensed the collision. Station 2 immediately truncated the current transmission, substituted the 32-bit jam signal and ceased all transmissions. During the collision and jam event that Station 2 was experiencing, the collision fragments were working their way back through the repeated collision domain toward Station 1. Station 2 completed transmission of the 32-bit jam signal and became silent before the collision propagated back to Station 1 which was still unaware of the collision and continued to transmit. When the collision fragments finally reached Station 1, it also truncated the current transmission and substituted a 32-bit jam signal in place of the remainder of the frame it was transmitting. Upon sending the 32-bit jam signal Station 1 ceased all transmissions.

A jam signal may be composed of any binary data so long as it does not form a proper checksum for the portion of the frame already transmitted. The most commonly observed data pattern for a jam signal is simply a repeating one, zero, one, zero pattern, the same as Preamble. When viewed by a protocol analyzer this pattern appears as either a repeating hexadecimal 5 or A sequence. The corrupted, partially transmitted messages are often referred to as collision fragments or runts. Normal collisions are less than 64 octets in length and therefore fail both the minimum length test and the FCS checksum test.

The next page will define different types of collisions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OSI layers / Peer-to-peer communications / TCP/IP model

OSI layers 2.3.4 This page discusses the seven layers of the OSI model. The OSI reference model is a framework that is used to understand how information travels throughout a network. The OSI reference model explains how packets travel through the various layers to another device on a network, even if the sender and destination have different types of network media. In the OSI reference model, there are seven numbered layers, each of which illustrates a particular network function. - Dividing the network into seven layers provides the following advantages: • It breaks network communication into smaller, more manageable parts. • It standardizes network components to allow multiple vendor development and support. • It allows different types of network hardware and software to communicate with each other. • It prevents changes in one layer from affecting other layers. • It divides network communication into smaller parts to make learning it easier to understand. In the foll...

Advantages and disadvantages of link-state routing

Advantages and disadvantages of link-state routing 2.1.5  This page lists the advantages and disadvantages of link-state routing protocols. The following are advantages of link-state routing protocols:  Link-state protocols use cost metrics to choose paths through the network. The cost metric reflects the capacity of the links on those paths. Link-state protocols use triggered updates and LSA floods to immediately report changes in the network topology to all routers in the network. This leads to fast convergence times. Each router has a complete and synchronized picture of the network. Therefore, it is very difficult for routing loops to occur. Routers use the latest information to make the best routing decisions. The link-state database sizes can be minimized with careful network design. This leads to smaller Dijkstra calculations and faster convergence. Every router, at the very least, maps the topology of it...

Ports for services

Ports for services 10.2.2  Services running on hosts must have a port number assigned to them so communication can occur. A remote host attempting to connect to a service expects that service to use specific transport layer protocols and ports. Some ports, which are defined in RFC 1700, are known as the well-known ports. These ports are reserved in both TCP and UDP.  These well-known ports define applications that run above the transport layer protocols. For example, a server that runs FTP will use ports 20 and 21 to forward TCP connections from clients to its FTP application. This allows the server to determine which service a client requests. TCP and UDP use port numbers to determine the correct service to which requests are forwarded. The next page will discuss ports in greater detail.